I had not invited him to lunch because I needed proof. I had invited him because I needed someone to say aloud what I already knew: the marriage was not merely in trouble. It was in its final form.
“So what are you going to do?” he asked.
I stirred my coffee and watched the cream marble.
“I’m going to find out for certain,” I said. “And then I’m going to make sure that if I leave, I leave clean.”
Dave put his sandwich down and looked at me more seriously than he had in years.
“Jonathan,” he said, “how long have you been thinking about this?”
“Long enough,” I said, “to stop being emotional about it.”
That answer unsettled him. I could tell. Men like us were raised to fear coldness more than rage. Rage is familiar. Coldness means something has already died.
He gave me the number for Eddie Marsh before we left.
Eddie was semi-retired and ran investigations out of a cramped office above a dry cleaner on Chicago Avenue. Years earlier I had used him for a tenant fraud issue. He had the face of a tired bloodhound and the habits of a man who trusted no one, which in his line of work qualified as professionalism.
I met him two days later.
He listened without interrupting while I explained the marriage, Paula’s job, Craig Hendricks, the late nights, the behavioral shifts.
When I finished, Eddie folded his hands over his stomach.
“You want proof of an affair,” he said.
“I want facts.”
“You want financials too?”
That caught my attention. “Why?”
He shrugged. “Because people having affairs start lying in clusters. Time, money, destination, mood. If she’s doing one kind of dishonesty, it’s smart to check the others.”
That was the best money I ever spent.
For the next three months, I learned the difference between suspicion and evidence.
Evidence is cleaner.
Leave a Comment