“You have no idea what you’re doing,” he said.
“I’m documenting discrepancies.”
“You’re dragging thirty-year-old grief into federal offices.”
“You seem very concerned about that.”
Silence on the other end for two seconds.
“You’re misinterpreting old business restructuring.”
“Then it’ll clear up quickly.”
His tone sharpened.
“You think this will restore some fantasy version of your father?”
There it was.
Not denial. Not confusion.
Contempt.
“My father earned a Bronze Star,” I said evenly. “He wasn’t reckless.”
“He was impulsive,” Thomas snapped. “He didn’t understand scale.”
“That’s not what his record says.”
“You’ve been digging through files for two days, and suddenly you’re an expert?”
I let that hang.
“This isn’t emotional for me,” I said. “It’s procedural.”
That was a lie.
But it was the kind he understood.
“You’re making a mistake.”
“If I am, the paperwork will prove it.”
I ended the call.
He didn’t text again.
Instead, an email arrived thirty minutes later.
Subject: Cease and Desist.
Attached was a formal letter from a law firm in Atlanta accusing me of defamation and unlawful interference with professional standing.
Fast.
Too fast.
He’d prepared that template in advance.
The letter warned of civil action if I continued spreading unfounded allegations.
I read it twice and laughed quietly.
You don’t send a cease-and-desist letter if you’re confident there’s nothing to find.
You send one if you want someone to panic.
I forwarded it to the intake officer’s public email address with a single line:
Subject attempting intimidation following documentation submission.
No commentary.
Just a timestamp.
Leave a Comment