If the financial case cracked open, other things could follow.
They asked for a formal recorded statement. I gave it. No embellishment. Just dates, documents, and what I had found.
They requested Carla Jennings’s contact information. I provided it.
They requested Father Hail’s statement regarding the preserved documents. I provided that too.
After two hours, Whitfield closed the binder.
“We’ll issue subpoenas for Brooks and Hail financial records dating back to 1994.”
That wasn’t quiet.
Subpoenas generate paperwork. Paperwork generates questions.
I left the building with a copy of my recorded statement request and a very clear understanding that Thomas would know soon.
He didn’t disappoint.
When I pulled into the driveway that afternoon, he was already waiting on the porch.
“You’ve triggered a subpoena,” he said flatly.
“Have I?”
“You think this stays confidential?”
“I assumed it wouldn’t.”
He stepped closer.
“They’re asking for thirty-year-old financial records.”
“If they’re clean, that’s inconvenient, not catastrophic.”
His composure was thinning.
“You don’t understand how this works.”
“That’s interesting. I thought paperwork was straightforward.”
His eyes hardened.
“You’ve embarrassed this family.”
“I didn’t do the transfers.”
That hit.
He exhaled sharply.
“You’re letting strangers rewrite history.”
“No,” I said. “I’m letting them read it.”
Silence.
He looked older in that moment. Not guilty. Just tired.
“Your mother was confused near the end,” he tried again.
“She started scanning documents in 2008.”
He didn’t respond.
That was new.
Inside the house, his study door was open for the first time in days. Papers stacked neatly. Computer screen dark.
I walked past it without stopping.
Two days later, Agent Miller called.
“We’ve reviewed the initial batch of subpoenaed records,” he said. “There are inconsistencies in how trust funds were reallocated post-liquidation.”
“Inconsistencies how?”
Leave a Comment